She re-invented the armbar.

As Ronda Rousey continues to gain popularity in the world of MMA fighting, the question on a lot of people's minds is the idea of her fighting a man. This idea is generally met with disapproval; generally negative of any said "man", because the idea of a man fighting a woman is immoral in society. it brings to question, in the context of sport, is it ever societally acceptable for a man to fight a woman? If so, under what guidelines? She is undoubtedly a very skilled fighter. It's unlikely most men wouldn't come out on the other side of a bad brush-in down a dark alley with her. So, as a professional in the context of sport, is it still immoral for a man to fight a woman?

Best answer: Ronda Rousey beat a chick who is a trained fighter in 14 seconds. So how fast a diva who probably can't fight for squat? Ronda would kill Nikki Bella.

I get anything I want. When I get my license my car will be Mercedes. My dad is a lawyer my mom is and accountent. When I ask my dad if we're rich he responds '' we do better than most with a smirk on his face'' what I have is a: A Mac a iPad, iPhone 6, plaza screen tv, a windows 8 a, Xbox one, 3 beats. 2 beat solos, and a nanny I go to privet school. I'm also a spoiled brat!

Sometimes, it feels like there is a lot of noise! It's difficult to know which news sources are credible and which ones aren't. Yahoo's editors and experts strive to bring you the most relevant, interesting news stories possible. Download the Yahoo app and discover a world of sharable exclusive stories, photos and more. http://yhoo.it/1FUYiXf"

Best answer: The big deal is that Netanyahu is anti-American. He is attacking the United States for attempting to work out an agreement with Iran that might prevent a war down the road.

And the unpatriotic conservatives in the House are lapping it up. Not because they are "pro-Israel." They aren't. A person can't support the legitimate rights of the Israeli people and at the same time endorse Netanyahu's violent agenda. But the anti-muslim and racist attitude fo the extreme right in this country is more important to them than anything -- including the best interests of the United States..

Keep in mind these anti-American elements are NOT criticizing a proposed treaty with Iran. That might be warranted. They are attacking the effort to find a peaceful solution, period.

That's not supporting the Israeli people. More important, it is an active and deliberate betrayal of the interests of the American people.

Is black a colour. Many people say it isn't. Why is this?

"This textbook discusses evolution, a controversial theory some scientists present as a scientific explanation for the origin of living things, such as plants, animals and humans. No one was present when life first appeared on Earth. Therefore, any statement about life's origins should be considered a theory. The word evolution may refer to many types of change. Evolution describes changes that occur within a species. (White moths, for example, may evolve into gray moths.) This process is microevolution, which can be observed and described as fact. Evolution may also refer to the change of one living thing to another, such as reptiles into birds. This process, called macroevolution, has never been observed and should be considered a theory. Evolution also refers to the unproven belief that random, undirected forces produced a world of living things. There are many unanswered questions about the origin of life which are not mentioned in your textbook, including: Why did the major groups of animals suddenly appear in the fossil record, (known as the Cambrian Explosion)? Why have no new major groups of living things appeared in the fossil record in a long time? Why do major groups of plants and animals have no transitional forms in the fossil record? How did you and all living things come to possess such a complete and complex set of instructions for building a living body? Study hard and keep an open mind.