Lv 19 points

Bouan Philippe

Favourite answers9%
Answers11
  • The British Military Intelligence is a disreputable organisation. True or false?

    Because they have hired racially inferior people who are working as double agents for the UK and its Third world counterparts.

    Consequently, such a treachery is encouraged by the UK Military Intelligence because they have hired people who have divided loyalties who have no right to live, but should be deported to the Third world.

    True or false?

    Politics3 days ago
  • Do all EU countries have the same arrest procedures regarding detention by the police?

    Are all detainees required to remove their shoe laces, footwear and trouser belts?

    Are personal belongings such as your wallet and cellphone confiscated whilst you are detained?

    Does the aforementioned apply across the EU, or does it simply reflect the "internal politics" of certain countries within the EU?

    Politics4 days ago
  • Eternal punishment for finite sins. True or false?

    Matthew 25

    41 “Then He will also say to those on the left hand, ‘Depart from Me, you cursed, into the

    EVERLASTING FIRE prepared for the devil and his angels: 42 FOR I WAS HUNGRY AND YOU GAVE ME NO FOOD; I WAS THIRSTY AND YOU GAVE ME NO DRINK; 43 I WAS A STRANGER AND YOU DID NOT TAKE ME IN, NAKED AND YOU DID NOT CLOTHE ME, SICK AND IN PRISON AND YOU DID NOT VISIT ME.'44 “Then they also will answer Him, saying, ‘Lord, when did we see You hungry or thirsty or a stranger or naked or sick or in prison, and did not minister to You?’ 45 Then He will answer them, saying, ‘Assuredly, I say to you, inasmuch as you did not do it to one of the least of these, you did not do it to Me.’ 46 And these will go away into EVERLASTING PUNISHMENT, but the righteous into eternal life.”

    Some have argued that, "There is only finite punishment for finite sin", which is refuted by the Canonical Gospel of Matthew, chapter 25.

    Accordingly, the bold script in verse 42 and verse 43 are but a few examples of "finite sins", which will be punished by "Everlasting hell" in verse 41 and verse 46.

    That "finite sins" will be punished by "Eternal hell" is indisputable according to the actual meaning of Matthew 25.

    3 AnswersPolitics5 days ago
  • Hell is everlasting. True or false?

    Matthew 25

    41 “Then He will also say to those on the left hand, ‘Depart from Me, you cursed, into the EVERLASTING FIRE prepared for the devil and his angels: 42 for I was hungry and you gave Me no food; I was thirsty and you gave Me no drink; 43 I was a stranger and you did not take Me in, naked and you did not clothe Me, sick and in prison and you did not visit Me.’ 44 “Then they also will answer Him, saying, ‘Lord, when did we see You hungry or thirsty or a stranger or naked or sick or in prison, and did not minister to You?’ 45 Then He will answer them, saying, ‘Assuredly, I say to you, inasmuch as you did not do it to one of the least of these, you did not do it to Me.’ 46 And these will go away into EVERLASTING PUNISHMENT, but the righteous into eternal life.”

    Revelation 20:10 The devil, who deceived them, was cast into the lake of fire and brimstone where the beast and the false prophet are. AND THEY WILL BE TORMENTED DAY AND NIGHT FOREVER AND EVER.

    The above Scripture (bold type) is loud and clear and IRREFUTABLE.

    That "Hell is everlasting", but Revelation 20:12-14 does nothing at all to contradict the idea that "Hell is everlasting".

    Because the Bible cannot possibly contradict itself, and there is nothing at all in Revelation 20:12-14 to say that "Hell is only temporary".

    5 AnswersReligion & Spirituality5 days ago
  • President Xi Jinping, Jesus is going to use his powers to make you defecate in your pants. But what are you going to do about it, eh?

    Jesus will use his powers to publicly humiliate President Xi Jinping, but what are you going to do about it?

    Politics7 days ago
  • President Xi Jinping cannot use China's nuclear weapons to threaten any nation, but Jesus can still use his powers to punish him. T or F?

    Whereas, China cannot use their nuclear weapons to threaten any nation Jesus can still use the power of "words" to punish, harm and humiliate President Xi Jinping and all the members of the Politburo.

    But what are you going to do about it, eh?

    How can you avoid being hurt and humiliated?

    3 AnswersPolitics7 days ago
  • China's cannot threaten nuclear war and its nuclear arsenal is practically useless. True or false?

    Having nuclear weapons doesn't mean that you can use them to attack Western nations with total impunity.

    Because no nation can win a nuclear war, which means that such weapons can only be a deterrent, but you could never actually use them to threaten any other country.

    In practice, China's nuclear arsenal is practically useless in the face of mere "words", which can be spoken to punish and humiliate any member of the Politburo Standing Committee, NPC and PLA.

    Ultimately, your threat of "nuclear war" is to no avail because mere "words" can still be used to punish and humiliate China's political leaders.

    But what are you going to do about it, President Xi?

    How are you going to avoid being battered by mere "words"?

    1 AnswerPolitics7 days ago
  • No army can win a war without their equivalent of  NCO's and Senior military officers. True or false ?

    The army is easy prey if you could eliminate all of the NCO's and Senior military officers.

    Because the army cannot be organised by professional private soldiers who lack the required expertise and know how to undertake basic tactical operations.

    True or false?

    1 AnswerPolitics1 week ago
  • You can starve the enemy into submission by eliminating all of their military and political leaders. True or false?

    By eliminating everyone who has expertise in macroeconomics you can destroy their economic organisation and starve them into submission, and therefore make the country susceptible to foreign invasion.

    True or false?

    1 AnswerPolitics1 week ago
  • What is the ethnicity of twins if one is black and the other is white?

    The question of "outward appearance" cannot be the sole determining criterion since they are twins, but they don't have the same appearance (or colour) at all.

    Ultimately, the question of "ethnicity" is not entirely down to the "outward appearance" of the individuals concerned.

    As attested by the above example.

    True or false?

    1 AnswerPolitics1 week ago
  • Ethnicity is not simply outward appearance. True or false?

    The Sun newspaper had produced an article depicting the birth of twins who are dissimilar in terms of their colour.

    Apparently, one is 'black', but the other one is 'white'.

    So what is their "ethnicity" given that they are twins, but they don't have the same colour or appearance?

    2 AnswersPolitics1 week ago
  • The Moonies' theology is foreign, false and inferior to the Christian Bible. True or false?

    Because there is an obsessive focus on sexual abstinence, more so than the Mainstream churches, which makes their religion inferior to Christianity in the mainstream.

    Sexual morality and abstinence is far less important than the new covenant's requirement to "honour" and "glorify" God (Romans 1:21), and to "Confess the lordship of Jesus Christ" (Romans 10:9).

    True or false?

    1 AnswerPolitics1 week ago
  • Ethnicity is a social and political construct invented by the political establishment. True or false?

    The "boundaries of ethnicity" are most often unfair and arbitrary ones because it is a socially constructed device that is intended to advance the interests of certain groups.

    You could be on either side of the fence depending on the actual time, place or society, because ethnicity is an "arbitrary social construct" that is invented by the political establishment.

    True or false?

    2 AnswersPolitics1 week ago
  • God's Kingdom is not only a spiritual kingdom per se, but is also an earthly kingdom. So what are you going to do about it, eh?

    Daniel 2:34 You watched while a stone was cut out without hands, which struck the image on its feet of iron and clay, and broke them in pieces. 35 Then the iron, the clay, the bronze, the silver, and the gold were crushed together, and became like chaff from the summer threshing floors; the wind carried them away so that no trace of them was found. AND THE STONE THAT STRUCK THE IMAGE BECAME A GREAT MOUNTAIN AND FILLED THE WHOLE EARTH.

    Daniel 2:44 And in the days of these kings the God of heaven will set up a kingdom which shall never be destroyed; and the kingdom shall not be left to other people; it shall break in pieces and consume all these kingdoms, and it shall stand forever.

    Revelation 21:1 NOW I SAW A NEW HEAVEN AND A NEW EARTH, for the first heaven and the first earth had passed away. Also there was no more sea.

    The above Scripture has served to illustrate the new covenant doctrine that God's Kingdom is Not a "spiritual kingdom per se", but is also an "earthly kingdom".

    So, what are you going to do about it, eh?

    6 AnswersReligion & Spirituality1 week ago
  • God's Kingdom is not only a spiritual kingdom per se. But what are you going to do about it, eh?

    Daniel 234 You watched while a stone was cut out without hands, which struck the image on its feet of iron and clay, and broke them in pieces. 35 Then the iron, the clay, the bronze, the silver, and the gold were crushed together, and became like chaff from the summer threshing floors; the wind carried them away so that no trace of them was found. AND THE STONE THAT STRUCK THE IMAGE BECAME A GREAT MOUNTAIN AND FILLED THE WHOLE EARTH.

    Daniel 2:44 And in the days of these kings the God of heaven will set up a kingdom which shall never be destroyed; and the kingdom shall not be left to other people; it shall break in pieces and consume all these kingdoms, and it shall stand forever.

    Revelation 21:1 NOW I SAW A NEW HEAVEN AND A NEW EARTH, for the first heaven and the first earth had passed away. Also there was no more sea.

    The above Scripture has served to illustrate the new covenant doctrine that God's Kingdom is Not a "spiritual kingdom per se", but is also an "earthly kingdom".

    So, what are you going to do about it, eh?

    Politics1 week ago
  • Hey, Preston Moon. Have you died yet?

    How is your malediction?

    Have you died yet?

    Politics1 week ago
  • Matthew 16:28 has never claimed that the Second Coming of Christ should have been two thousand years ago. True or false?

    Matthew 16:28 "Verily I say unto you, There be some standing here, which shall not taste of death, till they see the Son of man coming in His Kingdom?"

    The "death" that is mentioned in Matthew 16:28 is only to be seen in symbolic terms, but it is not Real "death" in a literal sense.

    Consequently, this particular passage has never claimed that the Second Coming of Christ should have happened two thousand years ago.

    Because the idea of "death" is only used in a symbolic sense within the context of Matthew 16:28.

    True or false?

    Politics2 weeks ago