Summary: I'm wondering if there are any well-reasoned arguments opposing any of the claims made in this article.
Here is the article, from a very reputable source:
It explains the theory of evolution in simple terms and also describes in simple terms the available evidence.
My personal opinion is that the article is accurate - but I'm not looking for agreement with my opinion. As I said above, I'm looking for any well-reasoned arguments disputing any of the claims made in the article.
So, my question is this: apart from the idea that your understanding of Genesis disagrees with that article, and that you trust Genesis more than you trust that article, what is it about the information in that article that is in error? You can address an individual topic addressed in the article (if you like). You can answer as simply as you like, as long as you use a well-reasoned argument to contest at least one point made in the article.