and these people are everywhere

Okay let’s not B.S. ourselves here. If you look at the world objectively you’ll see that most non white societies are backwards and behind compared to the white societies. They are behind culturally, technologically, socially, etc. Most non white societies have bad governments and stupid religions and cultures. Compare Africa, South America and Asia (Non white places) to Europe, North America and Australia (White majority places) You will see a huge difference. The white socities are much more advanced, civilized, rich, clean, humane than the non white societies which are usually poor, dirty, backwards, overpopulated and technologically behind. I’m not racist just stating the facts. Exception to this is japan and Singapore which are decent otherwise most non white societies are backwards.

They only single out whites. I'm sure they'll come up with inadequate and contrived excuses, but I find their targeting of only whites discriminatory and hypocritical.

And I no way am I trying to say that racist people don’t exist, they exist everywhere in every color, but I’m saying is that We’ve had a black president, there are black lawyers, doctors, cops, surgeons etc. Wouldn’t we think that if this country was running on racism, this stuff wouldn’t be allowed to happen?

Best answer: they are both identitarian. BLM is worse.

Best answer: Biological races do not exist in humans, race is a sociological construct, not a biological one and no races can be defined. There is more genetic variation within supposed races than there is between them. "White" and "black" are variations in skin colour like variations in hair and eye colour and are not races. Neither "white" nor "black" can be defined. Just about every country in the world stopped classifying people by "race" decades ago when DNA showed that races do not exist. The USA is the only country I know of that still does it.

Every time i see something from Cuba most people seem to be black and mulatto and i rarely see a white person

I m not American, and it always looked very strange to me. I can t understand the principle behind this issue. If the word is offensive, then nobody should say it, right? If it s not, then anyone is allowed to joke about it. What I see now, is that people cannot say some words because of their skin color. For me, it is straight, obvious racism.

Best answer: It depends on the racial breakdown of the half-Latino parent. Latinos can be any race or combination of races. Not to mention a lot of black people have some sort of European admixture unless they're directly from Africa.

The child would be predominantly black (about 75% more or less) with some 25% unknown Latino admixture that could be Native Indian, white, black, etc.

Best answer: Yes. All native Europeans are white.

In fact, it was Spaniards who invented the concept of the white race in the context of their new American colonies where they had three groups of people interacting--Native Americans (red race), Europeans (white race), and Sub-Saharan Africans (black race). The Spanish created the concept of the white race, since it did not exist before, and they used these new racial definitions to create a whole racial caste system in their colonies where black people were at the bottom, white people at the top, Native Americans in the middle, and the more white blood you had, the better off your socio-economic status was and your rights were.

Look up the Spanish caste system if you'd like to read more about it.

So yes, Spaniards are white people.

My mom is from Spain, and I am half Spanish. We have never identified as non-white ever. All ethnic Europeans and their descendants are white.

Blacks can say racist things and there is no backlash. For example Louis Farrakhan is deemed by the southern poverty law center as a black supremacist. Yet, no one protests him and other black racists. However, white nationalists like Richard Spencer are threatened and protested against for speaking in favor of white people. This is a double standard. Black disproportionately receive more things from the government Iike affordable housing and food stamps. Blacks benefit more from things like public transit and have extra rights like affirmative action which give them additional safety nets that white people simply do not have. Blacks pay disproportionately less into taxes and receive disproportionately more than what they put into it. It is whites' money being used to fund blacks. Black nations like South Africa can get away with government sanctioned discrimination. If a white nation based policy on skin color and seized land that non-whites built in today's world, they would be condemned. But South Africa gets away with doing precisely that. When a person complains about white nationalism rising, my response is always the same. White nationalism is the direct result / reaction of anti-white policies being pushed on white nations. Whites are getting fed up with their mistreatment in the very nations that their ancestors built and left to them. White nationalism and racism isn't going anywhere until and unless true equality is achieved (ending black privilege).

I’m not racist, just don’t understand the joke. “How can you tell Mario is racist? He’s an Italian plumber, made by Japanese people, who speaks English, looks like a Caucasian, jumps like a black man, and grabs coins like a Jew!” I don’t get it. And how is this racist?

Best answer: History is written by the winners, Australia's aboriginal population definitely did not win when England invaded.