• Trump is being brutally gang-beaten by the Liberal Media now, do you agree he should declare Martial Law?

    Best answer: How about just following and enforcing existing laws instead?
    Best answer: How about just following and enforcing existing laws instead?
    33 answers · Politics · 5 days ago
  • Are weather forecasts getting better?

    Best answer: Yes they are improving, and yes a skeptical blog would write about that if there were something interesting going on.
    In fact I googled "improved weather forecasting watts up with that" and found several pages of articles, just from one skeptical blog alone.
    Best answer: Yes they are improving, and yes a skeptical blog would write about that if there were something interesting going on.
    In fact I googled "improved weather forecasting watts up with that" and found several pages of articles, just from one skeptical blog alone.
    19 answers · Climate Change · 4 days ago
  • Is there a place to find the data of climate change without politics? I keep running into articles about"what must be done" not data itself.?

    Best answer: It depends on what you are trying to find. If you are looking for sea level data, there are both satellite and tide gauge measures. https://tidesandcurrents.noaa.gov/sltrends/sltrends.html https://www.nodc.noaa.gov/General/sealevel.html If you are trying to find temperature data, there are both satellite and... show more
    Best answer: It depends on what you are trying to find. If you are looking for sea level data, there are both satellite and tide gauge measures.
    https://tidesandcurrents.noaa.gov/sltren...
    https://www.nodc.noaa.gov/General/sealev...

    If you are trying to find temperature data, there are both satellite and temperature data taken at various stations.
    http://www.drroyspencer.com/latest-globa...
    https://crudata.uea.ac.uk/cru/data/temperature/



    If you are looking for extreme weather data, then which type of extreme weather? I recommend this report as a general overview.
    https://www.nap.edu/catalog/21852/attribution-of-extreme-weather-events-in-the-context-of-climate-change

    If you are looking crop production data (because SUPPOSEDLY global warming kills crops), then global crop is the best information.
    https://www.pecad.fas.usda.gov/

    If you are looking for something else, let me know, and I can share the links I use.

    If you review the data, you see two things. 1.) There is some warming that man is creating. 2.) It is not some impending catastrophe.

    I can back my statements with the data, EASILY. This is why I linked you to data, not hype.
    20 answers · Climate Change · 6 days ago
  • Why did Professor Ivar Giaever call global warming a religion?

    Best answer: Because it takes a lot of faith to accept it. Just look at those who believe and propose it. Al Gore (An admitted liar) Jimmy Hansen (A full time Communist agitator and a person who was caught red handed altering vital data.) Bill Nye (The science lie.) George Soros (A Nazi Collaborator.) Paul Ehrlich (A Biologist... show more
    Best answer: Because it takes a lot of faith to accept it. Just look at those who believe and propose it.

    Al Gore (An admitted liar)
    Jimmy Hansen (A full time Communist agitator and a person who was caught red handed altering vital data.)
    Bill Nye (The science lie.)
    George Soros (A Nazi Collaborator.)
    Paul Ehrlich (A Biologist who, like Al Gore and Jimmy Hansen, predicted an Ice Age back in the 70s.)
    Barry Obama (If you like your doctor, you can keep your doctor.)

    Scientifically, all these prominent men have failed in their assessment of the environment. Thus, to follow them takes a great amount of faith. And that comes under RELIGION!
    21 answers · Jokes & Riddles · 7 days ago
  • Did Climate Change claim more lives in London?

    Best answer: <<<Fears were raised that green energy concerns were prioritised ahead of safety as it emerged that cladding used to make the building more sustainable could have accelerated the fire.>>> I suppose there is always a balance between cost, risk and efficiency. In this case they lost. It does seem... show more
    Best answer: <<<Fears were raised that green energy concerns were prioritised ahead of safety as it emerged that cladding used to make the building more sustainable could have accelerated the fire.>>>

    I suppose there is always a balance between cost, risk and efficiency. In this case they lost. It does seem they could use a substance that wasn't so dangerous in hindsight. I believe in insulation. Having come from South Dakota, I know full well that is a money saver not to mention just making your home more comfortable. Here in California, they minimize insulation and I then have to climb up into the attic and add it and to the walls as well which is much more difficult. Climate change didn't claim the lives, but maybe overzealous attempts to curb energy use played a role.
    18 answers · Climate Change · 6 days ago
  • Why is oil bad?

    Best answer: Embrace your boogeymen and get over your fears. Oil has given us most of the progress in the two centuries. Koch Ind. helps feed, clothe, and move a large part of the nation. You're in way over your head with nothing but Oppose and Resist memes. Why aren't you living in a cabin in the woods by beeswax... show more
    Best answer: Embrace your boogeymen and get over your fears. Oil has given us most of the progress in the two centuries. Koch Ind. helps feed, clothe, and move a large part of the nation. You're in way over your head with nothing but Oppose and Resist memes. Why aren't you living in a cabin in the woods by beeswax candlelight? Because oil.
    20 answers · Climate Change · 1 week ago
  • Are you surprised that the EU, has pledged to team up with China to back Paris climate goals?

    Best answer: The Chinese and EU hierarchy understand science, in fact most of the world signed this agreement except Syria, which was ravaged by civil war and so didn't participate; Nicaragua who didn't sign the agreement because it didn't go far enough and......not America but what Noam Chomsky correctly labeled... show more
    Best answer: The Chinese and EU hierarchy understand science, in fact most of the world signed this agreement except Syria, which was ravaged by civil war and so didn't participate; Nicaragua who didn't sign the agreement because it didn't go far enough and......not America but what Noam Chomsky correctly labeled the most dangerous organisation in human history; the Republican party.

    The American public overwhelmingly understand science, the Republican party speaks for its funders

    Another unfortunate thing for deniers is that China is a dictatorship, they can accept climate change or not, there will not be any political pressure from special interests and yet they do accept it, this is because they understand basic science.
    9 answers · Climate Change · 5 days ago
  • IF EU is declaring to Trump no renegotiation of Paris Accord after 20 years of negotiation, what is the purpose of more IPCC conferences?

    Best answer: I don't understand what Trump is doing. 1.) It is possible that he is wanting to renegotiate to increase the CO2 reductions of other countries, because under the original agreements, US had agreed to the most reductions. If this is the case, then Warmers should be strongly behind Trump. If the Warmers... show more
    Best answer: I don't understand what Trump is doing.

    1.) It is possible that he is wanting to renegotiate to increase the CO2 reductions of other countries, because under the original agreements, US had agreed to the most reductions.

    If this is the case, then Warmers should be strongly behind Trump. If the Warmers remember correctly, they USED to think that the Paris agreement asked for too little from other countries.

    2.) Trump could simply be asking for less money from the US to go to the Climate funds with the other countries actually giving money. Warmers should be OK with this. This forces the issue that while the US has given 1 billion, no other country has really contributed at all. Forcing them to contribute, can be a good or bad thing.

    3.) Trump wants to lower the US CO2 reductions. If this is the case, Warmers should be upset.

    So to review #1 - Warmers should be very happy. #2 - Warmers should be rather indifferent. #3 - Warmers should be upset.

    Of course, most warmers are liberals, so it really doesn't matter if Trump is going for 1, 2 or 3, liberals are going to find an excuse to be upset.
    11 answers · Climate Change · 1 week ago
  • Why do you think that some people want books written to point out the side against the theory of Catastrophic Global Warming to be banned?

    Best answer: I have taken no interest in US politics until the most recent presidential election cycle. I come from the other side of the pond. However, since taking an interest I can now see exactly where Mr Hope, who was also born on this side of the pond, was coming from: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4a6YdNmK77k The... show more
    Best answer: I have taken no interest in US politics until the most recent presidential election cycle. I come from the other side of the pond. However, since taking an interest I can now see exactly where Mr Hope, who was also born on this side of the pond, was coming from: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4a6YdNmK...

    The instant change from "Comey should be fired" to "Comey should not have been fired" highlights the situation perfectly.

    I don't see a strategy but the Democrats do have a tactic. That tactic is to rubbish the opposition at every opportunity. They don't need any other reason. Banning dissenting books would obviously appeal as would banning dissenting voices of all kinds and playing up their point of view whenever they can.
    10 answers · Climate Change · 1 week ago
  • User , ?, are you dumb, ugly and stupid?

    Seems...
    Seems...
    11 answers · Other - Environment · 5 days ago
  • Should states and cities that declare they are against Trump's withdrawal from Paris Accord and they will support it be biled for green aid?

    Global contribution is supposed to be $100 billion per year. The US share is conservatively $20 billion. So these states and cities should contribute their share of this 20 billion if they say they are supporting the Paris Accord, right? New York has about 3 percent of US population, so that is 600 million for... show more
    Global contribution is supposed to be $100 billion per year. The US share is conservatively $20 billion. So these states and cities should contribute their share of this 20 billion if they say they are supporting the Paris Accord, right? New York has about 3 percent of US population, so that is 600 million for them, 2.5 billion from California.
    16 answers · Climate Change · 4 days ago
  • The difference between how climate has changed over the history of the earth compared to how climate has changed in recent,human history?

    HI! Plz help me with this question !!! thank you guys so much!!!!!!
    HI! Plz help me with this question !!! thank you guys so much!!!!!!
    11 answers · Climate Change · 1 week ago
  • IF EU is declaring to Trump no renegotiation of Paris Accord after 20 years of negotiation, what is the purpose of more IPCC conferences?

    Best answer: Trump is just adding some political diplomacy by talking about renegotiation, if they were to try and renegotiate Trump would just screw up the accord and they would get no where.
    Best answer: Trump is just adding some political diplomacy by talking about renegotiation, if they were to try and renegotiate Trump would just screw up the accord and they would get no where.
    7 answers · Climate Change · 4 days ago