So no evidence of a collusion?

Surprise, surprise...

Not really.

I said from the very start. If the Russians really helped Trump win, it was because they figured it would be an advantage to have an idiot in charge or their greatest rival country.

The whole affair is like a rejected plot for one of those cheesy 60s James Bond movies.

I guess people will believe anything, no matter how ridiculous, so long as it helps them shield their fragile ego.

7 Answers

Relevance
  • James
    Lv 7
    1 year ago

    不不不不不不

    • Commenter avatarLog in to reply to the answers
  • 1 year ago

    Looks like another sore loser here.

    • Commenter avatarLog in to reply to the answers
  • 1 year ago

    Like...you're the smartest democrat...like...ever.

    • Sebastijan
      Lv 6
      1 year agoReport

      I am not a Democrat. And i am not Republican either.

    • Commenter avatarLog in to reply to the answers
  • 1 year ago

    There is NO way the Russians would have given Clinton over $30 million dollars to begin with, then another $150 million payoff for the uranium deal, then do anything to help anyone running against Hillary. The whole mess was a Democratic deception & boondoggle to begin with to deflect attention from Hillary's shenanigans & investigation of Dem voter fraud, including the illegal aliens voting Democratic.

    • Neengefan
      Lv 7
      1 year agoReport

      Google Shepherd Smith from Fox,explaining uranium one. And the rest of your comment needs some proof. I suggest a fact checker, try 2 or 3 ...They will make things much more clear for your clouded brain.

    • Commenter avatarLog in to reply to the answers
  • What do you think of the answers? You can sign in to give your opinion on the answer.
  • 1 year ago

    Your a bit mixed up... Collusion is not a crime, BUT there is lots of evidence that the Russians interfered with the 2016 election, so you are wrong on that point

    • ...Show all comments
    • Sebastijan
      Lv 6
      1 year agoReport

      But i am not going to claim that i know for certain either way. Because as of yet, there is not sufficient evidence.

    • Commenter avatarLog in to reply to the answers
  • 1 year ago

    Sure

    • Commenter avatarLog in to reply to the answers
  • Anonymous
    1 year ago

    As long a I put LOL at the end of every sentence, I guess I am smugly correct LOL

    ANything I write must be true LOL

    • Commenter avatarLog in to reply to the answers
Still have questions? Get answers by asking now.