Is there a conundrum that astronomers consider a Black Hole that the Picture showed?

12 Answers

Relevance
  • Favourite answer

    If you watch Veritasium, he created a video a day before the picture was released and very accurately predicted wha tot expect. Additionall he goes into detail about what we're seeing the physics behind it,a nd what's nto resoivled in the image

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S_GVbuddri8

    Youtube thumbnail

    • Commenter avatarLog in to reply to the answers
  • 1 year ago

    Not so far as I'm aware - they've explained what it is we're seeing...

    • Commenter avatarLog in to reply to the answers
  • 1 year ago

    There is no conundrum for the scientists

    whodeived the algorithms that were used to.put the picture together from an array of radio tecopes inultiple locations.

    The conundrum is the the feral pu lics conundrum..the picture is NOT a picture of a black hole. The licgire is kg the av region disc surrounding the event horizon of supermassive e black hole 55 millionight years from us.

    • Commenter avatarLog in to reply to the answers
  • 1 year ago

    No conundrum.

    • Commenter avatarLog in to reply to the answers
  • What do you think of the answers? You can sign in to give your opinion on the answer.
  • 1 year ago

    You could say that

    Nobody can work out fully what they are all about

    But their Mass is just too much to Ignore

    The Collapsed Singularity of a Supergiant Star that has went Supernova

    Anything that comes near falls into its Gravity Trap

    Dust, Planets, Other Stars, Other Black Holes and even Light can't escape, the Gravity is so strong

    Their Centres are obscured, hidden by their Event Horizon

    Since no light can escape it is a perfectly Black Sphere, hence the Name

    They were first discovered as an X Ray source

    And Stephen Hawking proposed radiation caused by the Friction of Matter crossing the Event Horizon

    Some even say Space itself can be bent with such Gravity and even time Dilation can result

    They could be Gateways into Parallel Universes and all that gumpf !!

    Attachment image
    Source(s): Check out Messier 87
    • Commenter avatarLog in to reply to the answers
  • 1 year ago

    Conundrum? “You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means.”

    .

    .

    • Commenter avatarLog in to reply to the answers
  • Anonymous
    1 year ago

    The hole from their butts is also black inside

    • Commenter avatarLog in to reply to the answers
  • Anonymous
    1 year ago

    I'm not quite sure what you're asking since your English is so poor. If you're suggesting that it's somehow paradoxical, like that a picture can't capture a lack of light, then you clearly have no concept of how photography and negatives work or even what "black" means. Our brains via our eyes perceive the lack of light as black. There's no conundrum, no conflict, no quagmire, no paradox--especially since, if you saw the picture, the black hole was able to be depicted by showing light where the black hole wasn't, thus giving a boundary around the black that was the black hole.

    • Commenter avatarLog in to reply to the answers
  • KennyB
    Lv 7
    1 year ago

    Not really - the conundrum is in the name for a black hole, not the object itself.

    • Commenter avatarLog in to reply to the answers
  • 1 year ago

    Try asking this in your native language

Still have questions? Get answers by asking now.