Atheists deny God, yet you also deny any burden to disprove God when the burden is on you to prove your claims.... How is it that you don't understand that your affirmative claims Darwinism, Big Bang have the same burden?
We cannot agree that primordial slime can yield intelligent life when time and chance are added. Life requires a specific chemistry, but the atheist tells us life occured by chance. Life as we know it would not be possible if the laws of chemistry were different.
When you get around to objectively validating the Philosophy of Materialism then you have a rational basis to assert there is no God and can call those who believe there is a God irrational. Until then your assertions are irrational illogical unsupported unfounded fabricated myths and stories of OPINION; made up places you call reality, and it represents atheists congenital (hereditary or from birth) inability to accept factual verifiable evidence of reality.
It’s easy to be an atheist if you evade, ignore and deny operational science. It sorta shows your ignorance is obdurate and vacuous; relying on chance is not a plan.
Ultimately evolutionists want their religion of secularism and atheism—worldviews which are already being taught in public school classrooms—to be the only religion these students are exposed to. Of course, they claim that atheism is not a religion, but it is! In their worldview, they have faith that somehow the universe came into existence and by natural processes life arose—that is their belief system, their religion.
Atheism is not predicated on any positive claims, it is predicated on the assertion of 'no evidence' which is non-probative (i.e. no evidence does not prove either a negative or a positive, it is a de facto argument from ignorance). Of course the assertion of no evidence is predicated not on an absence of evidence but faith in the unproven philosophy of materialism. With the claim of no evidence based on unproven assumption atheism is rendered into a world view based on doubt, uncertainty and intellectual dishonesty. Does not sound to me to be a very compelling offer.
It is clear they all rest on the same philosophical base - Materialism... Communism and Socialism are open about it, Atheists try to deny it to avoid the burden, but it is clear from the language they use their world view is tied to it.