Ending birthright citizenship to illegal immigrants that's the loophole that needs to be closed. There can't be an argument at all about it?

18 Answers

Relevance
  • art
    Lv 6
    6 months ago

    Great Britain closed that loophole many years ago, any children born in Britain are considered the same natinallty as the parents, so the babies get deported along with the parents

    • Log in to reply to the answers
  • Foofa
    Lv 7
    6 months ago

    That isn't a "loophole" but rather an intentionally obtuse reinterpretation of what the 14th Amendment was meant to accomplish. This is hardly the only thing about US law that has some issues. Vis-a-vis immigration there are gaping problems ranging from how little one has to earn to sponsor a relative, to sibling sponsorship, to the H1B program being used as a race to the bottom for tech workers. Those are just a few of the things that contribute to this cluster eff the US has created for itself.

    • Log in to reply to the answers
  • 6 months ago

    There is no birthright citizenship to illegal immigrants. Immigrants are those who are born elsewhere and come after they are born. Birthright citizenship is given to those born in the country (including the children of illegal immigrants, but not the immigrants themselves).

    • dominick
      Lv 5
      6 months agoReport

      again brilliant and we need to stop it . Its a big loophole. First thing illegals do here is pop out three kids not 1 not 2 but 3 I've seen it. like to see statistics oh they won't show them to the American people..

    • Log in to reply to the answers
  • 6 months ago

    they need to stop that because the illegals are abusing it here in california. that's a reason why it's overpopulated here

    • Log in to reply to the answers
  • What do you think of the answers? You can sign in to give your opinion on the answer.
  • 6 months ago

    ABSOLUTELY....... in fact.... ALL immigration should be stopped as well.....

    • Log in to reply to the answers
  • A.J.
    Lv 7
    6 months ago

    There sure can be an argument about it.

    First of all, it is something Trump wants. Secondly, it is based on US Supreme Court decisions based on the structure of the US Constitution. Trump knows an Executive Order would be just another annoying piece of toilet paper to wind through the courts and highly likely be voided.

    There are only two paths. One is a US Constitutional Amendment. They are few and far between. The other path is a concerted effort by both Houses of Congress and signed into law by the President crafted in such a way that the US Supreme Court can bend and clarify a support in a reversal of their historical interpretation.

    It can be part of a bipartisan comprehensive immigration reform that documents all current residents in some way cleaning up the whole issue of the 10 million or so people here now. If Trump and McConnell want to actually fix a problem in a fair way, they need to cooperate with the House.

    Otherwise, just as Moscow Mitch, the Grim Reaper of the Senate lives to be a pain in the rump that our President has an extra "T" in the phrase, the House will do the job they are elected to do and that is keep as much balance and sanity as possible. How much will the sham dictators give to get what they want?

    The cash employment evading FICA and Income Taxes also needs a fix, and that happens by documenting the people here illegally now. I happen to like Buttigieg's proposal, a new level below "Green Card" of permanent resident.

    • dominick
      Lv 5
      6 months agoReport

      Well lets get it amended its time. its a loophole

    • Log in to reply to the answers
  • 6 months ago

    If you want to keep families together, then jus sanguinis is the only way to go. A child takes the citizenship of its parents, and only the citizenship of its parents!, wherever born. Of course, even in US (or other countries allowing jus solis), a child still has birthright citizenship in its parents' country. Alas, too many people fail to think about that.

    The 14th Amendment was solely intended for people LEGALLY present in the US at that time. Yes, it absolutely is long past time to stop the erroneous interpretation of the 14h Amendment, and end allowing citizenship to offspring of those not legally present. Keep families together! Mandate illegal alien & other foreign parents get their child a passport from their country of citizenship, & mandate parents take their kid back to their own country. People temporarily present (e.g. students, foreign workers on temporary visas) should not be muddying the waters of citizenship, either.

    • ...Show all comments
    • susan
      Lv 7
      6 months agoReport

      Amo, if passed, the legislation would apply going forward from a specific date. And it would not end legal immigration. Every year millions of adults meet all the legal requirements and pass the citizenship test and become naturalized citizens of the USA. Their children would be US citizens.

    • Log in to reply to the answers
  • 6 months ago

    It needs to be changed because too many people are abusing it. You got Chinese flying over the United States just to give birth on US airspace so their kids would be US citizens. You got central and South Americans sneaking into the US to give birth so that they can stay in the US.

    • Log in to reply to the answers
  • 6 months ago

    Not a fan of the Constitution eh?

    • ...Show all comments
    • Lisa A
      Lv 7
      6 months agoReport

      It isn't in the constitution, or even in an amendment. It is in a misguided decision by the SCOTUS.

    • Log in to reply to the answers
  • Alex
    Lv 7
    6 months ago

    Then technically you have violated the community guidelines because this isn't really a question.

    • ...Show all comments
    • Alex
      Lv 7
      6 months agoReport

      Sorry @#$%nuts...a question mark doesn't make it any less of a rant than it is...and rants are against the community guidelines.

    • Log in to reply to the answers
Still have questions? Get answers by asking now.