Anonymous
Anonymous asked in EnvironmentGlobal Warming · 2 months ago

Is there any reputable scientist who disputes that CO2 is a greenhouse gas?

16 Answers

Relevance
  • Dirac
    Lv 4
    2 months ago
    Favorite Answer

    No.  In fact there are not even very many crackpots that dispute that.

    • Log in to reply to the answers
  • JimZ
    Lv 7
    2 months ago

    There aren't any decent ones that thinks CO2 is causing catatrophic, runaway or even harmful warming overall.  Those that think the word greenhouse gas is something bad are gullible.  

    • Dirac
      Lv 4
      2 months agoReport

      Your answer is clearly a lie. Many of the world's top scientists have warned us about global warming. There was, for example, a declaration from three dozen Nobel winning scientists warning about it. Are you going to say that they all are not "decent" scientists?

    • Log in to reply to the answers
  • F
    Lv 6
    2 months ago

    I'm a scientist and I wouldn't dispute there is carbon dioxide in my greenhouse.

  • 2 months ago

    100% of "REPUTABLE" scientists claim there is no scientific basis that CO2 is a pollutant, also CO2 is a minor greenhouse gas.

    Source(s): Physics.
    • Dirac
      Lv 4
      2 months agoReport

      Your answer is clearly a lie--don't you want to make it even somewhat plausible?

    • Log in to reply to the answers
  • What do you think of the answers? You can sign in to give your opinion on the answer.
  • 2 months ago

    Being a "greenhouse gas" does not mean that it is the primary driver of changes in the climate.  So no person who is a scientist denies that it is a "greenhouse gas", plenty understand that a global climate is way too complex to be understood by current models and measurement systems.

    • David2 months agoReport

      When you say "plenty" you mean a tiny minority of the whole. Obviously you use a different meaning for the word "plenty".

    • Log in to reply to the answers
  • 2 months ago

    CO2 is naturally occurring. However, anyone wants to classify it, is a secondary step.

    • Log in to reply to the answers
  • 2 months ago

    Always the commentators!(then what?)

    • Log in to reply to the answers
  • John
    Lv 4
    2 months ago

    I'm not sure what you are asking?

    "Greenhouse gas"? Its not a good idea to pump pure co2 into greenhouses.

    You'll kill the plants.

    You use natural air in greenhouses and use good airflow to counter the excessive heat and moisure , contained areas produce with the sun shining directly on them.

    Greenhouses are not hothouses.

    • Darwinist
      Lv 5
      2 months agoReport

      He is asking about what is known as the Greenhouse Effect. It is about the absorption and emission of radiation in the atmosphere.  Perhaps it's name is misleading, but it has nothing to do with greenhouses.

    • Log in to reply to the answers
  • Edgar
    Lv 4
    2 months ago

    You do know that co2 is .039% of the Earth's atmosphere, don't you? LOL

    • ...Show all comments
    • Oregon Alley Cat
      Lv 7
      2 months agoReport

      "You do know that co2 is .039% of the Earth's atmosphere, don't you? LOL" And? Your point is? If there is too much then that isnt a positive thing, regardless of the percentage. Weak-*** argument

    • Log in to reply to the answers
  • 2 months ago

    Not in liberal la la land.

    Former NASA scientist Dr. Roy W. Spencerhttp://www.drroyspencer.com/global-warming-natural...

    • ...Show all comments
    • Curtis 1911
      Lv 7
      1 month agoReport

      Global warming and cooling are totally natural events occurring for billions of years and humans are not the cause of or the cure for either.

    • Log in to reply to the answers
Still have questions? Get answers by asking now.