Who is less royal - Prince Harry, son of James Hewitt or Princess Beatrix, granddaughter of Lord Porchester?

14 Answers

Relevance
  • 10 months ago
    Favourite answer

    Harry is less royal because Beatrice is still The Queen's grandchild with or without Philip's input.

  • 9 months ago

    No this rubbish again Harry was two years old when his mother met Hewitt.

  • geezer
    Lv 7
    9 months ago

    So .. You're saying that Charles isn't Harry's father

    and Phillip isn't Andrew's father.

    IF THAT WAS TRUE (it's NOT true by the way)

    Beatrice would be royal

    because Andrew's mother is the Queen

    and Harry wouldn't be royal at all.

  • Ann
    Lv 6
    10 months ago

    Interesting that you were there both times.

  • What do you think of the answers? You can sign in to give your opinion on the answer.
  • Anonymous
    10 months ago

    James  Hewitt is a commoner

  • PAMELA
    Lv 7
    10 months ago

    Oh go away stupid.

  • Rico
    Lv 5
    10 months ago

    Louise, clone of Mrs Elizabeth Schleswig-Holstein-Sonderburg-Glücksburg Mountbatten Windsor.

  • Clo
    Lv 7
    10 months ago

    They are both royal as their fathers are Charles and Andrew, not Hewitt or Porchester.

    Andrew's daughter's name is spelled Beatrice.

  • Anonymous
    10 months ago

    The Beatricia princess, daughter of the Fergie and Andrew, is less royal by virtue of having been born to a father who himself was sired by the commoner Lord Porchester. 

  • Anonymous
    10 months ago

    Yet another stupid trolling question from an idiot

  • 10 months ago

    Is the Duke of Sussex some sort of variation on virgin birth? How could he be the son of James Hewitt when he was born before his mother ever met Hewitt? The Duke is closer to the throne (6th) in the line of succession than his cousin Beatrice (9th).

Still have questions? Get answers by asking now.