Do you agree that it is best for a family to have three children?

13 Answers

Relevance
  • 2 months ago

    The middle child syndrome is real! Sometimes it’s best to have an even number so that one child doesn’t feel left out. If you do have 3, just don’t forget about the middle child if they’re all within 2 years of each other. 

    • Commenter avatarLog in to reply to the answers
  • Anonymous
    2 months ago

    0 is a better ideal.

    • Commenter avatarLog in to reply to the answers
  • Anonymous
    2 months ago

    There is no "best" when it comes to truly 

    having kids & 'r-body has their own way's 

    of viewing thing's which will vary among 

    1 another!

    ............................................................

    • Commenter avatarLog in to reply to the answers
  • 2 months ago

    one of each.....................

    • Commenter avatarLog in to reply to the answers
  • What do you think of the answers? You can sign in to give your opinion on the answer.
  • 2 months ago

    At least 2.5 children. Four might be better. With three, sometimes two gang up on one.

    • Commenter avatarLog in to reply to the answers
  • Anonymous
    2 months ago

    I'm a big fan of zero kids.

    • Commenter avatarLog in to reply to the answers
  • 2 months ago

    Disagree. Three is an odd number, and kids tend to hang out with one or the other sibling, leaving the third child by himself.

    • g2 months agoReport

      As one of three myself(the youngest) the middle child was sadly left out and overlooked at times. An even number of children(2 of each gender) no more than 3 years apart in age is a well balanced family unit of the 1980’s-1990’s.

    • Commenter avatarLog in to reply to the answers
  • 2 months ago

    I think two is the best. Even number. You can take care of each other.

    • Commenter avatarLog in to reply to the answers
  • y
    Lv 7
    2 months ago

    No I do not, never heard that before. Each family is different so the perfect number of kids for each family. Would also be different.

    • Commenter avatarLog in to reply to the answers
  • Jill
    Lv 7
    2 months ago

    No. Why would 3 children be best? 

    • Commenter avatarLog in to reply to the answers
Still have questions? Get answers by asking now.