Is twitter guilty of interfering with the builded up to 2020 election ?

5 Answers

Relevance
  • Anonymous
    1 month ago
    Favourite answer

    The tagging of social media posts by election candidates that fail fact-checking as "unsubstantiated" is a welcome development in enhancing the democracy of election campaigns.

    • Commenter avatarLog in to reply to the answers
  • Edwena
    Lv 7
    1 month ago

    Tweeter needs to be careful. Applying the comment to Trump's post makes it an editorial, which makes it a publication. Why that is important is that it will cause for the division of tweeter newspaper and Tweeter corporate research and investment. In other words, Tweeter will be broken up. Refer to Rockefeller and standard oil. Rockefeller could have controlled the world just by controlling the patent on a gasoline tank filler hole and the pump nozzle. Equivalent same for the high techs.

    • Commenter avatarLog in to reply to the answers
  • Anonymous
    1 month ago

    No, they just started to fact check Trump's bullchit. Joe Scarborough killed his assistant? Trump is insane 

    • Commenter avatarLog in to reply to the answers
  • 1 month ago

    Trump has lost his marbles. Biden may not the sharpest knife in the drawer but it's clear to all of us that the Boss is a frickin nut.

    • Commenter avatarLog in to reply to the answers
  • What do you think of the answers? You can sign in to give your opinion on the answer.
  • 1 month ago

    No. Trump should've been kicked off their platform anyway for repeated violation of their ToS, but they give him a pass because his tweets are considered in the "public interest".

    It's ironic how conservatives want businesses to deny service to gay people, but when a private company enforces their terms of service against them they cry that they are being oppressed. It seems you can't really have it both ways.

    • Commenter avatarLog in to reply to the answers
Still have questions? Get answers by asking now.