britney asked in Social ScienceGender Studies · 2 weeks ago

Are supporters of affirmative action for women being sexist to claim women need to be advantaged to succeed?

9 Answers

Relevance
  • 2 weeks ago
    Favourite answer

    "Are supporters of affirmative action for women being sexist to claim women need to be advantaged to succeed?"

    Yes, they are.  This is the feminist disrespect of women showing. They don't believe that any woman can look an equal male in the eye and ever win in a fair competition; without some legal measures to handicap the male first.  And by continuing to push for these advantages for females only, what today's feminists are saying is that women are inherently NOT equal, and therefore need advantages built in ALL THE TIME in order for women to be able to meet men at their level.

    This is especially true today in the first world, where pretty much all women have never been legally discriminated against during our lifetime. It's become difficult to respect women as a group when they are seen to be the benefactors of these privileges bestowed upon them by the hands of the feminist lobby.

    How do we know if any woman deserves her position, or if she was favourably placed there due to affirmative action? We all went to school together, where we were all treated equally. So why are the rules suddenly changed to handicap males when we are in the work world today? 


    • ...Show all comments
    • .Jerry.
      Lv 7
      1 week agoReport

      What the héll is going on dude?? Are you that butthurt over people that disagree with your ideology??  You have to attack them first.  And then you get mad when they reply back and whip your demented slow brain??

      Give me a break!

    • Commenter avatarLog in to reply to the answers
  • 6 days ago

    Women wish to offset unearned male privileges. That is the nature of any affirmative action.

    • ...Show all comments
    • .Jerry.
      Lv 7
      6 days agoReport

      But we shouldn't be using legal methods like affirmative action in order to combat differences in biology. Because then we are back to legally discriminating against people on the basis of sex. How is that any better? It's worse!

    • Commenter avatarLog in to reply to the answers
  • 1 week ago

    Sexist double-standard and a belief that women are less able to survive prison, and that they are more honest than men.

    • Commenter avatarLog in to reply to the answers
  • amy
    Lv 6
    1 week ago

    Its sexist to both men and women and also hypocritical. Women are essentially toddlers that need a hand with every thing at the expensive of men yet at the same time these toddlers that need the help at the expense of men can do anything a man can. If they can do anything a man can then why must we be treated as toddlers. Despite interest in engineering I wont go into that field because of affirmative action. Ill never know if I actually achieved that advance on my own or simple to fill a quote dimissioning anything ill ever achieve.

    • ...Show all comments
    • amy
      Lv 6
      1 week agoReport

      But not the result. How many times have you heard of winners claiming it ruined their lives. No amount of free handouts will make you happy and fulfilled.

    • Commenter avatarLog in to reply to the answers
  • What do you think of the answers? You can sign in to give your opinion on the answer.
  • Mark
    Lv 7
    1 week ago

    Not really... And "affirmative action" is a concept that died out in the 1970s.  Of course, I would not accuse you of (oh, the horror!) watching "television", but there was a commercial in which a woman says to her new employer "I just needed a chance" and the majority of women in the workforce feel the same. So it's not "hiring an unqualified women for a job", it's more like "giving women an equal chance of GETTING a non-secretarial job".  Sorry, "women should be nurses and men should be doctors" just doesn't work.  Let me guess:  you never have sex and are a straight white male and are angry  ("women owe me sex").

    • amy
      Lv 6
      1 week agoReport

      Actually majority of drs are women so.. yes STEMs in certain fields are dominated by men but are also dominated by women in other fields in there like medicine, chemistry, bioscience etc all woman dominant fields. So your example of only men should be drs when women dominate it is stupid.

    • Commenter avatarLog in to reply to the answers
  • Anonymous
    2 weeks ago

    @',|,'@

    I would NEVER support any kind of håťėful 

    môvėmėnt even if my own life truly did dėpėnd 

    upôn śuch a thing so the best answer is a firm

    NO, yo !!!

    ×#×#×#×#×#×#×#×#×#×#×#×#×#×#×#×#×#×#×#×#×

    • Commenter avatarLog in to reply to the answers
  • Extremely sexist

    • Commenter avatarLog in to reply to the answers
  • 2 weeks ago

    Sounds like you are saying women are less than because they cant move up by themselves. It's may be sexist but I refuse to give women the advantage just because they are women and seen as weak. If I have to work for a good future and a better job then they have to as well. The people claiming that are retarded

    • Commenter avatarLog in to reply to the answers
  • 2 weeks ago

    Is Jerry stupid to believe we don't know he's answering his own questions? Look beggar there's nothing for you to say. 

Still have questions? Get answers by asking now.