Anonymous
Anonymous asked in Politics & GovernmentPolitics · 2 months ago

Trumpies, why would this judge lie?

Third Circuit rejects Trump campaign’s Pennsylvania appeal, and in blistering terms:

“Charges require specific allegations and then proof. We have neither here,” wrote the judge, who is a Trump appointee.

6 Answers

Relevance
  • Anonymous
    2 months ago
    Favourite answer

    Btw--the guy who wrote that? A Far Far Far Right Trumpturd...just amazing isn't it?

  • 2 months ago

    Why do these articles always say things like "in blistering terms"  How absurd.  When will pissing on Trump end?

  • 2 months ago

    Who said he lied?

    If there is no evidence then a judge will not convict.

    Oh, but Wait! The judge wasn't provided evidence for the purpose of charging anyone with anything. That was has not the purpose of that hearing. The purpose as to gain an opportunity to continue the process and prevent a premature judgement on the issues being addressed.

  • 2 months ago

    We should all be thankful that Trump has appointed judges who uphold the constitution and respect the rule of law instead of making partisan based rulings.    

  • What do you think of the answers? You can sign in to give your opinion on the answer.
  • hamel5
    Lv 7
    2 months ago

    The Judge had been appointed by Trump 

    Where's the LOYALTY?    That's going to leave a mark.  

  • Anonymous
    2 months ago

    It's an extreme case of mental illness 

Still have questions? Get answers by asking now.