Trumpies, why would this judge lie?
Third Circuit rejects Trump campaign’s Pennsylvania appeal, and in blistering terms:
“Charges require specific allegations and then proof. We have neither here,” wrote the judge, who is a Trump appointee.
- Anonymous2 months agoFavourite answer
Btw--the guy who wrote that? A Far Far Far Right Trumpturd...just amazing isn't it?
- 2 months ago
Why do these articles always say things like "in blistering terms" How absurd. When will pissing on Trump end?
- Philip HLv 72 months ago
Who said he lied?
If there is no evidence then a judge will not convict.
Oh, but Wait! The judge wasn't provided evidence for the purpose of charging anyone with anything. That was has not the purpose of that hearing. The purpose as to gain an opportunity to continue the process and prevent a premature judgement on the issues being addressed.
- MichaelLv 72 months ago
We should all be thankful that Trump has appointed judges who uphold the constitution and respect the rule of law instead of making partisan based rulings.
- What do you think of the answers? You can sign in to give your opinion on the answer.
- hamel5Lv 72 months ago
The Judge had been appointed by Trump
Where's the LOYALTY? That's going to leave a mark.
- Anonymous2 months ago
It's an extreme case of mental illness