What did Lewis Wolpert mean when he stated that ‘reliable scientific knowledge is value-free and has no moral or ethical value’ (p. 1254)?

3 Answers

Relevance
  • Anonymous
    2 months ago

    He meant exactly what he said. This is perfectly understandable English that isn't in some kind of coded or obscure terminology. If you do not understand the words, consult a dictionary. 

  • 2 months ago

    He saying scientific law is greater than God law. Science oppose the idea God can do all things

  • 2 months ago

    If I lay out particle science concepts, they have no value ethically. If, however, I am tampering with biology, ethical concerns are apt to emerge -- something Wolpert didn't include in this hypotheses. 

Still have questions? Get answers by asking now.